Curriculum experience that has been used
Hi all, here I will explain a little of my experience regarding the use of the curriculum that I have used during. The curriculum that I have used is the 2006 curriculum or KTSP and the 2013 curriculum.
I used the ktsp curriculum from my elementary to junior high school grade 2. Here I got good material from the teacher and I also got computer subjects. The assessment is more towards academic even though there are non-academic assessments but they are more directed upwards and it is important to see academic values, besides that learning is also more detailed and detailed. For majors during high school, this curriculum applies from class XI, which means that in class X all students study all subjects because there are no majors but at the time after there are majors according to the majors taken. 2013 curriculum itself I only have 2 years of experience using the curriculum. What I feel is academic and academic assessment, then there are subjects that increase children's creativity so that from a non-academic and academic perspective, it is very important. In addition, the subjects taught are not very detailed, meaning that students must be more independent in finding material and studying it. For majors in high school, all students get majors from the beginning they are in high school and they also continue to study all subjects even though they choose their high school major. There is such a thing as compulsory subjects, interests, between interests and deepening. The assessment is carried out not only on grades, but on the existing process more than the 2006 curriculum
No comments:
Post a Comment